Roughly 12.5% of all babies born in the United States each year are premature (Archibald, 2006). That is a about half a million children being born before the 37th week of gestation is complete.
While in the hospital, new parents need an advocate. That advocate can be the registered nurse. The role of the RN is that of a care provider for the neonate. However, it is also one of an educator and facilitator of communication for the needs of the family. Too often families are made to feel like visitors in special areas of the hospital like the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit). By implementing the three strategies of incorporating a family centered care plan, unrestricted access to the child and treatment participation, and developing good communication skills with full information sharing, the RN can help the families become contributors, rather than spectators, in the care of their neonate.
When a newborn and parents are separated, the necessary bonding time is greatly diminished. According to Wong (2006), infants begin to develop a sense of trust as they learn the feel, sound, and smell of their parents. When their parents are gone, the neonate must learn to trust the nurses. However, the nurse is also associated with pain as well as comfort. It is important for the parents to be enveloped in the care of their child so that the neonate does not begin to associate pain with their care provider. During this time, the parents also discover the personality of their infant and how to recognize their needs by the behavioral cues displayed. When their time is limited in the NICU, the personalities go undiscovered and these cues go unlearned. When the previously mentioned strategies are put into practice, these developmental tasks can be completed successfully.
The first strategy is to create a family centered care plan (FCC). By incorporating family centered care into the unit, those stresses can be alleviated tremendously. FCC is creating a partnership between the parents and the hospital staff. There are four main concepts to FCC. They are dignity and respect, information sharing, family participation, and family collaboration (Cisneros, 2003). Though implementing family centered care can be difficult, it brings positive outcomes for both the family and the child. There is not a single way that all neonatal units must operate their family centered care. Each location is different depending on the needs of the staff and patients. The facility begins with a vision and a philosophy. It is suggested that the staff in the neonatal unit participate in developing these documents. Sharing of ideas and reviewing all feedback allows for a clear and well developed vision to emerge. Families are also an integral part of developing FCC. Those who have the experience of having a child in the neonatal intensive care unit are a valuable resource to consult when making changes to the program.
The second strategy is finding ways to involve parents in the care of their child. Parents are no longer seen as visitors but as critical components in the care plan of the child. Unlimited access to their baby at any time of the day is essential. It is important for the parents to be able to be there to comfort their child and learn ways to ease their tensions and pain. The nurse is the educator for the parents. He or she provides the information and guidance to help the parents through this difficult time. Two important areas that the nurse needs to help the mother in are kangaroo holding and breastfeeding. Kangaroo holding is skin to skin contact between mother and baby. These things are necessary, not only for the development of the infant, but also as a way for the mother and child to bond. Parents are encouraged to participate in the care of their child while they are in the NICU. Physical contact, especially kangaroo holding, has been shown to help the baby thrive as well as promote bonding between child and parent (Johnson, 2005). They show the parents how to take part in the infants care so that they may spend as much time as they wish with their baby. Many infants in the NICU have feeding problems or are unable to digest properly. The NICU nurse aids the mothers in breast and bottle feeding. The nurse takes time to show the parents how to read monitors, adjust equipment, and explain difficult medical jargon so that they are comfortable and understand clearly. Parents leave the NICU with a bond to the staff that cared for their child. Some even bring the baby back to show that they are thriving. “It’s a great reminder that the NICU isn’t a horrible place. Most babies leave here and grow into happy, healthy kids. You’d never know that they ever had a health problem” (American Baby, 2007).
The third strategy is developing good communication with the families. The largest contribution to family-centered care is the participation of the families. The NICU nurse is not only a caregiver and educator, but he or she must be an excellent communicator. As a result of being informed of every detail, the parents feel a sense of involvement and control in their decision making. By providing explanations and honest answers, the nurse helps the parents to build confidence in their abilities. Being this close allows the parents to make better decisions regarding the care of their baby and gives them the opportunity to become more connected to the child. Daily communication between the nurse, the other hospital staff, and the parents keeps the flow of family centered care moving. If the parents do not feel included in their infants care plan, then family centered care has not been achieved. “To support the philosophy of FCC, attention must be paid to teaching and supporting nurses’ communication skills, and relationship building with self, peers, and families” (Griffin, 2006).
While taking care of the half a million children born prematurely each year, the role of the RN is that of a care provider for the neonate and an educator and facilitator of communication for the needs of the family. The purpose of FCC is to provide the parents with a greater role in the care of their infant. By implementing the three strategies of incorporating a family centered care plan, unrestricted access to the child and treatment participation, and developing good communication skills with full information sharing, the RN can help the families become contributors, rather than spectators, in the care of their neonate.
Archibald, C. (2006, Mar-Apr) Job satisfaction among neonatal nurses.
Pediatric Nursing. Pitman: Vol. 32, Iss. 2, p. 162, 176-179.
Cisneros-Moore, K., Coker, K., DuBuisson, A. & Swett, B. (2003, April) Implementing potentially better practices for improving family-centered care in neonatal intensive care units: success and challenges. Pediatrics 111. Retrieved Apr. 22, 2007 from www.pediatrics.org.
Griffin, T. (2006, Jan-Mar) Family-centered care in the NICU. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing 20. Retrieved Jan. 3, 2007 from Expanded Academic ASAP database.
Johnson-Nagorski, A. (2005, Jan-Feb) Kangaroo holding beyond the NICU. (Updates & Kidbits)(neonatal intensive care unit). Pediatric Nursing 31. Retrieved Jan. 3, 2007 from Expanded Academic ASAP database.
Special babies, special care. American Baby. Retrieved April 13th, 2007 from http://www.americanbaby.com.
Wong, D., Perry, S., Hockenberry, M., Lowdermilk, D., Wilson, D. Maternal Child Nursing Care. St. Louis: Mosby, 2006.
a. Intervention 1 –Incorporating a family-centered care plan
i. Disadvantage 1 – The family-centered care plan that the facility has adopted may not fulfill the needs of each individual family.
Unrestricted access to their infant and treatment participation only may not fulfill the emotional and psychiatric needs of the family. It takes more than just family-centered care to assist the parents. Hospitals that offered a combination of formats for support services: group support, one-to-one support, and telephone support were more effective at meeting the needs of the infant’s parents. (Hurst, 2006). The family-centered care ideology is all too often “cookie-cutter” and not adaptable to the individual family needs.
Hurst, Irene (2006). One size does not fit all: parents' evaluations of a support program in a newborn intensive care nursery. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 3, 252. Retrieved February 3, 2008 from ProQuest database.
ii. Disadvantage 2 – Support groups are more effective than family-centered care.
Parents often become frustrated when they have a child in the NICU. The unknown environment and language can be overwhelming. Though family-centered care tries to alleviate these issues, it has several hang-ups. It does not leave the parents with an outlet for frustrations. Group support offered more opportunities for families to problem-solve communication issues with nursery personnel and provide information that assisted parents' involvement in their babies' care. Parent support programs offer an important mechanism to assess provider approaches to facilitate family-centered care (Hurst, 2006). By having others to talk with who are going through the same experiences, the families can become more connected and have a place to discuss their fears and concerns.
Hurst, Irene (2006). One size does not fit all: parents' evaluations of a support program in a newborn intensive care nursery. Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 3, 252-255. Retrieved February 3, 2008 from ProQuest database.
b. Intervention 2 –NICU nurses need to develop good communication skills and fully share care information with the family.
i. Disadvantage 1 – Years of experience and clinical work setting influenced both perceptions and practices of family-centered care.
A recent study of sixty-two licensed registered nurses looked at the level of implementation of family-centered care. It covered the necessity of family-centered care and current nurse practices. According to Peterson, Cohen, and Parsons, 2004, scores representing current nursing practice of family-centered care were significantly lower than those representing its necessity (p = .000). Nurses with 10 years or fewer of neonatal or pediatric experience scored significantly higher on both the total Necessary Scale (p = .02) and total Current Scale (p = .017) than did those with 11 years or more. Nurses who work in the NICU scored significantly lower on the total Necessary Scale (p = .013) than did nurses who work in pediatrics or PICU. Although nurses agree the identified elements of family-centered care are necessary, they do not consistently apply those elements in their everyday practice.
Peterson, M., Cohen, J., & Parsons, V. (2004). Family-centered care: do we practice what we preach?. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing : JOGNN., 4, 421-424. Retrieved January 31, 2008 from ProQuest database.
ii. Disadvantage 2 – The fear of the unknown and a lack in trust of the healthcare provider can lead the mother to feel trapped. Heermann, Wilson, and Wilhelm (2005) reported that mothers "struggled to mother" because nursing interactions pushed the mothers to the sidelines and left the mothers feeling unimportant in the life of their child. The power struggles between the mothers and the nurses with each trying to position herself as the 'expert' on the infant. Heermann, Wilson, and Wilhelm (2005) found that mothers attempted to negotiate partnership relationships with professional caregivers but that their actions were frequently misunderstood or unrecognized. Thus, the primary focus in this study was the mother's developing relationship with the infant and ways in which that relationship was affected by interactions with the nurses.
Heermann,J., Wilson,M., Wilhelm, P. (2005). Mothers in the NICU: outsider to partner Pediatric Nursing, 3, 176-183. Retrieved January 31, 2008 from ProQuest database.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Family Centered Care in the NICU
Preventing Heart Disease
Travis Cox
As of 2007, heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and it includes a variety of diseases relating to the heart (AHA, 2007). Heart disease is very costly and creates quite a burden for the patients affected as well as their families.
As of 2007, heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States and it includes a variety of diseases relating to the heart (AHA, 2007). Heart disease is very costly and creates quite a burden for the patients affected as well as their families. With nursing education, heart disease can be reduced. It can also help maintain the health of patients at risk or those who have been diagnosed with heart disease. Nurses have the proper training and are more cost effective than using physicians for educational means. With proper nurse education and intervention through nurse led clinics, clients who either have heart disease or are at risk for heart disease will have significantly better quality of life. Heart disease targets people who are with hypercholesterolemia, have hypertension, hyperglycemia, which are smokers or, TABP (Type A Behavior Patterns) which has been recently added to the list (AHA, 2007). Because these problems are very prominently found in today’s society, heart disease is common and hard to avoid. In 2005, it was estimated that the cost of heart disease in America was $394 billion (CDC, 2005). This ever-increasing problem can be avoided or managed by maintaining basic day to day activities which include: decreasing cholesterol in daily diet, avoiding obesity by regular exercise, avoiding a sedentary lifestyle, smoking cessation, controlling diabetes and having regular check ups and health screenings. (CDC, 2005) As a nurse, strategies such as education, screenings in outpatient clinics and community screening can lead to a decrease in heart disease and better lives for those with heart disease.
There are many techniques that a nurse can utilize when educating people on the importance of preventing heart disease. Diet, exercise and smoking are three main categories that ought to be addressed. The American Heart Association has many pamphlets and brochures that talk about strategies and methods to prevent this disease (AHA, 2007). Education should focus on the methods used to prevent heart disease such as reducing cholesterol, lowering salt intake and avoiding obesity. Avoiding foods high in saturated and trans fat can help reduce cholesterol. One of the biggest obstacles for this issue is educating those in poverty who find it easier and cheaper to eat a ninety-nine cent high fat cheeseburger then to buy fresh fruits and vegetables from the grocery store (Wright, 2007). Preventative diets include ones high in vegetables and fruits as well as avoiding large quantities of red meat and foods high in Omega-3 fatty acids (found in many seafood products). One of the most common preventative diets is the Mediterranean style diet which consists mainly of olive oil, bread, abundant fruit and vegetables, a moderate amount of wine, and animal products such as lamb, sausage and goat cheese (Wright, 2007). Exercising regularly can also help to reduce the risk of heart disease. It is recommended that the average adult get 30 minutes of moderate exercise 5 times a week (AHA, 2007). Nurses should also promote smoking cessation programs or products that can help people to stop smoking such as nicotine gum or patches. There are nearly 135,000 smoking-related cardiovascular disease deaths per year (AHA, 2007). Education on this matter can be the first step to promoting a healthy lifestyle and reducing the occurrence of heart disease.
Along with education, people screened early and screened often have a better chance of avoiding or fighting heart disease. Nurse led clinics have been a proven resource in reducing the number of people with heart disease as well as improving the lifestyle of those with heart disease (CDC, 2005). Studies involving three different styles of outpatient teaching methods and screenings were done and compared in 2001. These studies showed that people responded to and were more apt to attending nurse led clinics. The study compared hospital screening, physician run clinics and nurse led clinics. The results showed that the nurse run clinics had more visitors with a better rate of identifying patients at risk. They also had better follow up care and better education retention with an overall 85% success rate and a 33% better overall experience according to patients (Campbell, 2005). Nurse led clinics also were more cost effective per patient with better success rates according to a 2005 study which showed that nurse led clinics can thrive financially in a community while serving a valuable purpose (Berg, 2007). Clients at these clinics receive advanced screenings based on their predisposition to heart disease. They will receive proper education, screening for blood pressure and cholesterol and monitoring for patients with heart disease to help them get on track (Berg, 2007).
Besides nurse led clinics, nurses can help educate and screen in the community. Mobile operation centers such as school and office screenings can be set up with correspondence to the American Heart Association (AHA, 2007). These mobile screenings can have a significant impact in catching people pre disposed or those who may have early signs of heart disease but have not yet been diagnosed. These early tests (education, cholesterol and blood pressure screening) can save a life as well as start someone down the right path in getting well. These early warning stations can also be a very helpful resource for preventative education.
Strategies such as education and early detection are the absolute key to preventing heart disease. Nurses can be a valuable tool in all these venues. Nurses can help people pre disposed to heart disease to stay healthy and treat people with heart disease so that the quality of life for these people becomes better rather then declining into a state where the disease process takes over and eventually ends in death. Overall nurses can educate, prevent and sustain people’s health regarding heart disease. Nurses are cost effective, properly trained and caring enough to get the job done.
INTERVENTION DISADVANTAGES:
Disadvantage A)
Mobile operation centers such as school and office screenings can be set up with correspondence to the American Heart Association (AHA, 2007). These mobile screenings can have a significant impact in catching people pre disposed or those who may have early signs of heart disease but have not yet been diagnosed.
Reason Number 1:
The cost of running and maintaining these mobile operation centers would be to costly to justify their use.
To make this option work well, the city would be required to make an investment to a fleet of vehicles, man power to operate and maintaining those vehicles, man power to work out of those vehicles and screen patients, the cost of supplies, advertising the location of screening clinics and possible paying for temporary housing for the vehicles. According to an article from Children’s Advocate, the cost of running a mobile health center can be over $500,000 in the first year and then $250,000 every year after that to maintain the program. This money would need to come from taxes, fund raisers or private funding which is not practical (Santana, 2005).
Reason Number 2:
Pre screening of patients does not determine that those people at risk or currently living with heart disease will have the motivation or means to seek out regular professional medical help.
The range of people who would be screened in this system is to vague to guarantee that people would follow up with primary care providers or seek out providers if they currently do not receive care. With our current health care system those uninsured would not benefit from this except by gaining some understanding of a disease that they may have. They do not have the insurance or money to seek out routine care to guarantee their future health. Those with insurance or means to seek out care may not follow up with their doctors. We can not be sure that the costs will not out way the benefits. In a research article published in PHN, who screened 222 people for ongoing visits to the mobile centers and follow up exams 3 in 10 people screened did not seek further medical expertise. 8 in 10 of these people could not afford the cost of medical exams, further treatment or transportation to medical facilities (Betty, 1998).
Disavantage B)
Nurse led clinics have been a proven resource in reducing the number of people with heart disease as well as improving the lifestyle of those with heart disease
Reasons number 1:
Nurse led clinics cost more per individual then medical facilities that can meet all of their needs.
The cost of running a nurse lead clinic is astronomical, without MD support the services provided are limited and patients still have to be referred to other medical facilities. Although they may be able to screen and educate they can not do numerous treatments needed to help patients. Patients would much rather be seen in an all encompassing site where all there needs can be met. In a study of 19 nurse led clinics that dissected the willingness of patients to pay for the amount of services rendered for heart disease the cost was (on average) $254 higher in the nurse clinics providing intervention then in just assessing and educating. This extra cost per individual would make it very hard for a nurse led clinic to compete with other medical centers (Campbell, 2005).
Reason number 2:
Nurse led clinics do not have the resources to effectively treat and manage people with heart disease.
Nurse led clinics lack the resources available to treat heart disease patients. They must be referred to treatment centers and hospitals for continuous care. Although nurse led clinics can help educate and prevent heart disease they still lack this essential tool to treat people with heart disease. In my research for this article I found that a majority of clinics that were nurse led failed because of the feeling that they were not giving adequate care to their patients (Campbell, 2005).
References
American Heart Association (AHA). (2007). Exercise and Fitness. Retrieved October.
17, 2007 from http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=1200013
Berg, S., Hertz, P.. (2007). Outpatient Nursing Clinic for Congenital Heart Disease Patients: Copenhagen Transition Program. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22, 488-492. Retrieved November. 17, 2007 from http://www.jcnjournal.com.
Betty, A., Elnitsky, C. (1998). Rural Mobile Health Units: Outcomes. Public Health Nursing. Vol. 15 (1), 3-11. Retrieved January. 31, 2008 from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1525-1446.1998.tb00314.x?cookieSet=1&journalCode=phn
Campbell, N.C., Murchie, P., Ritchie, L.D., & Thain. J. (2005). Running nurse-led secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease in primary clinics: Qualitative study of health professionals’ perspectives. British Journal of General Practice, 55, 522-528. Retrieved April. 12, 2007 from PubMed Central database.
Campbell, N., Murchie, P., Raferty, J. (2005) Cost effectiveness of nurse led secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease in primary care: follow up of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 707. Retrieved January. 31, 2008 from http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/330/7493/707
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (CDC). (2005). Preventing Heart Disease and Stroke. Retrieved October. 17, 2007 from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/factsheets/Prevention/cvh.htm
Santana, J. (2005). Going Out to the Community, Mobile Clinics Bring Health Care to Families. Childrens Advocate, 12, 96 – 100. Retrieved January. 31, 2008 from http://www.mobilehealthclinicsnetwork.org/featured.html
Wright, J. (2007). Nutritional Spices of Life. Journal of Community Nursing, Vol. 21 (10), 10-16. Retrieved November. 21, 2007 from http://www.jcn.co.uk/index.html
Travis Cox
Adolescent HIV Prevention and Education
Sexually active young people in the United States are at persistent risk for HIV infection. This risk is especially notable for youth of minority races and ethnicities.
Continual prevention outreach and education efforts are required in order for adolescents to receive clear and accurate information. Approximately 4,842cases of HIV are diagnosed yearly among people ages 15-24 years (Eaton et al., 2006). With this rate of HIV infections among adolescents it is clear that additional efforts are required as new generations replace the generations that benefited from earlier prevention strategies. Adolescents are receiving mixed messages regarding HIV due to the medications that are now available and longer life expectancy of those living with the disease. Nurses working with adolescents can be pivotal in reaching youth before high-risk behaviors are established by identifying high risk adolescent populations, promoting education, and eliminating barriers to testing.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has conducted biennial Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance (YRBS) studies since 1991 in order to identify priority risk behaviors among youth. The results for the YRBS are obtained from students in grades 9-12 who participate in national, state, or local surveys. Of the students surveyed, 46.8% had engaged in sexual intercourse at least once in their life (Eaton et al., 2006). Male students were consistently ranked higher in risk taking behaviors than female students. Minority students (African American and Hispanic) predominately had more risk behaviors than Caucasian males or Caucasian females. These behaviors included multiple sexual partners, unprotected intercourse, and injection drug use (Eaton et al., 2006). Although most students receive some form of preventative health care annually, few discuss STD, HIV, or pregnancy prevention at those visits (Burstein, Lowry, Klein, & Santelli, 2003).
Understanding and identifying adolescent populations that are statistically at higher risk for HIV is a key strategy for nurses. Beedy-Morrison, Nelson, and Volpe (2005) provide evidence that Caucasian adolescent girls engage in higher HIV risk behaviors and receive less HIV testing compared with African American adolescent girls. Although HIV prevalence is higher among African American adolescents, the authors emphasize the implications the result of this study has on health care professionals. According to the findings, if Caucasian girls are more likely to engage in risky sexual behaviors and yet are less likely to be tested, there may be many undiagnosed HIV cases. In addition to the undetected HIV cases, the information health care professionals utilize to identify high risk groups may be inaccurate. Authors Goodenow, Netherland, and Szalacha (2002) found significantly high rates of HIV risk behaviors among bisexual adolescents. A study conducted in Seattle and British Columbia supports the previous research but also found a higher likelihood of HIV risk behaviors among sexually abused students in all sexual orientation categories (Saewyc et al., 2006). Nurses must promote greater community awareness of at-risk adolescents and seek to educate those populations. Education can occur through street outreach, pamphlets with referrals, posters, and classes where youth are located such as the YMCA or Boys and Girls Clubs of America.
Another key strategy for nursing professionals is to provide reality based education. HIV education should include “skills in negotiation, conflict resolution, critical thinking, decision-making and communication, which improves their self-confidence and ability to make informed choices such as postponing sex until they are mature enough to protect themselves from HIV, other STIs and unwanted pregnancies” (Unicef, 2002, p.26). Rew, Whittaker, Taylor-Seehafer, and Smith (2005) suggest that nurses must make sure confidentiality boundaries are established in order to build trust. Adolescents are more receptive to nurses that are open and direct and move from less sensitive topics to more sensitive topics during an assessment. Nurses must assist youth in establishing clear goals for preventing HIV and focus on specific health behaviors related to those goals. Adolescents need to be encouraged to talk with their parents and delay sexual intercourse. If delaying sexual intercourse is not an option adolescents must be taught about the risks and effective contraception methods that will protect against pregnancy, STD’s, and HIV.
An additional strategy nurses need to utilize is to eliminate barriers to sexual health promotion in order to provide effective HIV education. Barriers such as embarrassment, worries about confidentiality, previously bad experiences, and access problems can prevent an adolescent from seeking care. Lindberg, Lewis-Spruill, and Crownover (2006) found that African American adolescents “viewed available healthcare systems as formidable and unwelcoming and healthcare providers as judgmental and disrespectful” (p.85). The adolescents pointed to lack of privacy, having to discuss the problem with multiple personnel including the receptionists, and long waiting times as major barriers. In order to target adolescents, they need a place where they can receive competent care in a relaxing, private, and adolescent focused environment. A teen health clinic with a non-medical environment and open staff is one solution to this problem. Other options include private entrances for teens or a prescribing nurse available at schools.
Currently, we do not yet have a cure or vaccine to prevent HIV. This disease is still winning the war but there is an arsenal of weapons at our command. Nurses must have the know-how and the ability to utilize the resources available. The key to making a difference for adolescents is the adoption of successful HIV prevention interventions, paired with ongoing evaluation of their effectiveness in reducing risky behaviors or increasing safer behaviors. The key strategies addressed provide a foundation to prevent adolescent HIV infection rates. However, many more strategies will be required in order to find success. Young people need the tools to protect themselves from HIV infection and it is going to require a community collaborative effort.
Intervention I- Provide Reality Based Education
Disadvantage I- Limited and Inconsistent HIV Education
HIV prevention work cannot take place without certain ‘tools’ – things that can be used by those at risk of HIV to prevent infection. Ongoing discrimination against HIV positive people and a high number of annual infections suggest that AIDS education in the US is not as effective or as widespread as it could be. A 2006 survey for example found that 10% of Americans thought that there were drugs that could cure HIV, and 29% thought HIV could be transmitted through kissing. Although comprehensive sex education in schools is generally considered the best context in which to teach about AIDS, only around 60% of teachers report using a comprehensive (or abstinence-plus) system. About 34% teach strict abstinence-only programs, while at least 6% teach absolutely nothing at all. The exact content of what is taught can also vary considerably, and many have reported that even in schools where comprehensive education is theoretically taught, a lot of important information can be missed out or glossed over.
UNICEF (2002). Young people and HIV/AIDS: Opportunity in crisis. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/pub_youngpeople_hivaids_en.pdf
Disadvantage II – Outside Variables Can Affect HIV Curriculum Success
Important factors other than curriculum characteristics may dramatically affect their success. In general, at least three groups of factors may affect whether a curriculum-based program produce behavior change: 1) the characteristics of the curriculum and its implementation; 2) the needs, deficits (and assets) of the youth being served by the program; and 3) the characteristics of the youths’ environment, especially the prominence of AIDS, other STDs or teen pregnancy. In some communities in the United States where few young people hear messages to delay sex until older and where HIV is a salient issue, programs that encourage young people to delay sex in order to avoid HIV may be effective, whereas they might not be effective in other communities where youth already hear those messages or where HIV is not a salient issue.
Kirby, D., Laris, B.A., & Rolleri, L. (2006). Sex and HIV education programs for youth: Their impact and important characteristics. Family Health International, 1-76. Retrieved from www.etr.org on January 28, 2008
Intervention II – Eliminating Barriers to HIV Prevention Education
Disadvantage I – Health Care Access and Poverty Prevent Youth From Seeking Care
Studies have found that young people face a host of barriers to health care, including limited access to transportation, lack of confidentiality and youth-friendly service delivery environments, fear about seeking care, and lack of information about services available. Nearly 1 in 4 African Americans and 1 in 5 Hispanics live in poverty. The socioeconomic problems associated with poverty, including lack of access to high-quality health care, can directly or indirectly increase the risk for HIV infection.
Burstein, G.R., Lowry, R., Klein, J.D., & Santelli, J.S. (2003). Missed opportunities for sexually transmitted diseases, human immunodeficiency virus, and pregnancy prevention services during adolescent health supervision visits. Pediatrics, 111(5), 996-1002. Retrieved January 3, 2007, from Expanded Academic ASAP database.
Disadvantage II- Less Effort to Reaching “Other” At-Risk Populations
There is a need to pay more attention to the needs of specific groups of young people like young parents, young lesbian, gay and bisexual people, as well as those who may be out of touch with services and schools and socially vulnerable, like young refugees and asylum-seekers, young people in care, young people in prisons, and also those living on the street. Young people who drop out of school are more likely to become sexually active at younger ages and to fail to use contraception.
Rew, L., Whittaker, T.A., Taylor-Seehafer, M.A., & Smith, L.R. (2005). Sexual health risks and protective resources in gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual homeless youth. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 10(1), 11-19. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from EBSCO Research database.
References
Beedy-Morrison, D., Nelson, L.E., & Volpe, E. (2005). HIV risk behaviors and testing rates in adolescent girls: Evidence to guide clinical practice. Pediatric Nursing, 31(6), 508-513. Retrieved January 14, 2007 from Expanded Academic ASAP database.
Burstein, G.R., Lowry, R., Klein, J.D., & Santelli, J.S. (2003). Missed opportunities for sexually transmitted diseases, human immunodeficiency virus, and pregnancy prevention services during adolescent health supervision visits. Pediatrics, 111(5), 996-1002. Retrieved January 3, 2007, from Expanded Academic ASAP database.
Eaton, D.K., Kann, L., Kinchen, S., Ross, J., Hawkins, J., Harris, W.A., & et al. (2006). Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States 2005. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55(SS-5), 1-112. Retrieved January 31, 2007, from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr
Goodenow, C., Netherland, J., & Szalacha, L. (2002). AIDS-related risk among adolescent males who have sex with males, females, or both: Evidence from a statewide survey. American Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 203-210. Retrieved January 9, 2007, from PubMed central database.
Kirby, D., Laris, B.A., & Rolleri, L. (2006). Sex and HIV education programs for youth:Their impact and important characteristics. Family Health International, 1-76Retrieved from www.etr.org on January 28, 2008.
Lindberg, C., Lewis-Spruill, C., Crownover, R. (2006). Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care: Urban male adolescents speak out. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 29(2), 73-88. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from EBSCO Research database.
Rew, L., Whittaker, T.A., Taylor-Seehafer, M.A., & Smith, L.R. (2005). Sexual health risks and protective resources in gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual homeless youth. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 10(1), 11-19. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from EBSCO Research database.
Saewyc, E., Pooh, C., Murphy, A., Skay, C., Richens, K., Reis, E. (2006). Sexual orientation, sexual abuse, and HIV risk behaviors among adolescents in the pacific northwest. American Journal of Public Health, 96(6), 1104-1110. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from EBSCO Research database.
UNICEF (2002). Young people and HIV/AIDS: Opportunity in crisis. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved October 2, 2007, from http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/pub_youngpeople_hivaids_en.pdf
Smoking Cessation and the Role of the Nurse
Habitual smoking is a worldwide health crisis that can shorten life expectancies by over 20 years and create fatal illnesses such as lung cancer, emphysema and heart disease (Whyte,2007).Because smoking can lead to chronic and acute illnesses, nurses can have and impact on their clients health by educationg them on the importance of smoking cessation.
Paste the rest of your old paper plus the new part and all the references over these words. Leave the following text intact.Nursing strategies for this are to act as role models by not smoking themselves, promoting smoking cessation in the adult clients, and educating children and adolescents on the dangers of taking up smoking.
The International Council of Nurses believes that nurses can be very helpful in the prevention of smoking and smoking cessation. Nurses can help to reinforce this influence on their client’s by not smoking themselves since they are regarded by the public as important health role models. Just as important, or even more so is to provide a good example for their own children in order to safeguard the nurses health and that of their family. Children of smokers have an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome, respiratory infections, lung cancer and ear infections (Kellogg, 2002).
Smoking and the willingness to try a smoking cessation program should be assessed with clients. Nurses working in Dr’s offices who see the same clients on a regular basis are in an optimal position to do this. Cost should not be a deterrent since the clients’ employer may offer programs or their insurance benefits may cover the cost of smoking cessation programs. While some clients may not be ready to quit, the nurse may follow an approach called the “transtheorhetical model of change.” This method is a way to help clients move through stages such as: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action and maintenance in order to prepare them for smoking cessation. During precontemplation, the client has no intent on quitting smoking in the next six months. The contemplation stage is the time that the client has an intention to quit during the next six months time. Preparation is the stage that the client has planned to quit in the next 30 days and has taken behavioral action toward action. The stage that follows preparation is the action stage which includes clients who have quit for less than six months. Lastly, is the maintenance stage in which the client has remained free of smoking for more than six months.
Another approach for the nurse to use with smoking cessation is the intervention steps known as the five A’s which include: ask, assess, advise, assist and arrange (Whyte, 2007). Asking clients about their smoking is always the first step. For the younger person asking about what their friends do is also important. Assessing includes whether or not the client is ready to make a change within the next 30 days. Advising pertains to providing help and motivation for the smoker to quit. Assisting the client could include many options such as: setting a quit date, recommending smoking cessation pharmacotherapy, removing all tobacco items from the clients’ environment, individual or group therapy, expecting challenges and enlisting help from friends and family. Lastly, arranging follow up contact by either in-person or telephone conversations to keep track of the client and continue with support.
Nurses can also help support their clients by educating them on the available pharmacotherapy treatments for smoking cessation. There are six currently available treatments approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for smoking cessation: one nonnicotine treatment and five nicotine replacement products that differ based on delivery mechanism (Ford, 2006). The nicotine replacement products include the nicotine inhaler and nasal spray which are available by prescription and the nicotine gum, lozenge and patch which are available over the counter. Clients should be advised to completely stop smoking before using nicotine replacement product to increase their chance of success. Sustained-release bupropion (bupropion SR) is approved by the FDA for smoking cessation, is available by prescription in tablet form and should be started before the client stops smoking. It is believed to ad smoking cessation through the inhibition of various neuro chemicals normally activated in the brain by smoking (Scanlon, 2006). Bupropion SR Bupropion SR and the nicotine patch can be combined for another alternative.
While interventions and pharmacotherapy’s can be effective in smoking cessation with the adult population, smoking prevention among children and adolescents is better than the cure. The younger a person begins to smoke, the greater their risk of smoking-induced diseases such as cancer or heart disease (Whyte, 2002). For this age group, peer lead prevention programs can be very effective. These can include videos or films which highlight the social consequences such as: smelly clothing, bad breath, financial cost and decreased athletic ability. Nurses working in schools can help by promoting smoke-free environments and reinforce the dangers of smoking.
Smoking has many adverse effects on health and contributes greatly to morbidity and mortality. Because smoking can lead to chronic and acute illness, nurses can have an impact on their clients’ health by educating them on the importance of smoking cessation and the avoidance of smoking in children and adolescents. Nurses can also set a healthy example by not smoking themselves. These strategies can help to increase abstinence rates and decrease tobacco-related mortality and morbidity which can help to improve their client’s lives.
Intervention #1- Promoting smoking cessation in adult clients.
Disadvantage #1- The high addictiveness of cigarettes.
Due to the high addictiveness of tobacco, clients participating in smoking cessation treatments do not always respond as readily as many healthcare professionals would like. It is the complex neurobiology of tobacco that is likely to be responsible for the development of tobacco dependence. The nicotine is the principal addictive component of tobacco smoke and shares many of the pharmacological characteristics of a psychostimulant drug such as amphetamine and cocaine.
Balfour, D., (2002). The Neurobiology of Tobacco Dependence: A Commentary. Respiration. 69, (1). 7-11. Retrieved February 4, 2008, from Proquest database (677604631).
Disadvantage #2- The financial costs of smoking cessation treatments.
Smoking cessation medications can range in price from $3.50 to $11.00 per day. Medicare does not cover smoking cessation treatments and private insurers have been reluctant to cover these costs as well. Their lack of coverage comes even as the healthcare savings has been estimated to be $1,623 a year for each person that quits smoking. Fortunately, tobacco cessation treatments are available and effective, and more medications are being developed to treat tobacco dependence. However, the inability of tobacco users to afford these treatments remains a barrier to reducing smoking cessation.
Solberg, L., (2005, June). Impact of insurance coverage on the use and effects of smoking cessation medications. Disease and Management Health Outcomes. (3). 151-58. Retrieved February 5, 2008, from EBSCO database (1173-8790).
Intervention #2-Educating children and adolescents on the dangers of taking up smoking.
Disadvantage #1-Peer pressure and the smoking behavior of their closest friends.
Research findings show that adolescent peer relationships contribute to adolescent cigarette smoking. Youth who are friends with smokers have been found to be more likely to smoke themselves than those with only nonsmokers as friends. Best friends, romantic partners, peer groups and social crowds all have been found to contribute to the smoking or non-smoking behavior of teenagers. Rather than coercive pressures, the decision to smoke has been found to be more about trying to fit in, social approval and popularity.
Castrucci, B.C., Gerlach, K.K., Kaufman, N.J., Orleans, C.T., (2002, September). The association among adolescents’ tobacco use, their beliefs and attitudes, and friends’ and parents’ opinions of smoking. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 6(3). 159-67. Retrieved from EBSCO database February 5, 2008.
Disadvantage #2- Advertising and promotion of smoking that appeal to adolescents.
Despite tobacco industry claims, researchers have consistently implicated cigarette marketing activities as an important catalyst in the initiation of smoking in adolescents. Due to advertising, studies show and increase in smoking rates among population subgroups specifically targeted by marketing campaigns.
Biener, L., (2000, March). Tobacco marketing and adolescent smoking: more support for a casual inference. American Journal of Public Health, 90(3). 407-11. Retrieved February 5, 2008, from EBSCO database (0090-0036).
References
Kellogg, John Harvey, (2002, June). Tobaccoism. American Journal of Public Health, 92 (6). 932-934. Retrieved October 12, 2007, from EBSCO database (0090-0036).
Potts, Lisa A., (2007, August 15). Emerging psychotherapies for smoking cessation. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 64 (16). 1693-1698. Retrieved October 12, 2007 from EBSCO database (1079-2082).
Saarman, L., Daugherty, J, & Riegel, B. (2002, June). Teaching staff cognitive-behavioral intervention. MedSurg Nursing, 11(3). 144-151. Retrieved January 7, 2007, from Expanded Academic ASAP database (A87509029).
Scanlon, A. (2006, November). “Nursing and the 5A’s guideline to smoking cessation interventions”. Australian Nursing Journal, 25(4), 14- . Retrieved January 7, 2007, from Expanded Academic ASAP database (A154562471).
Whyte, F., & Kearney, N. (n.d.). Enhancing the nurse’s role in tobacco control. Retrieved February 4, 2007, from http://www.tobacco-control.org/tcrc_Web_Site/Pages_tcrc/Resources/Factsheets/enhancenursesrole.pdf